Like all mining and natural resource extraction companies, Teck can take a bad rap for their actual or perceived damage to the environment. I will be a realist and admit that some damage is going to be incurred whether we are talking about the oil sands in Fort McMurray or Teck’s lead/zinc smelter in Trail, BC. Of course I am still very concerned about the extent of the damage and companies must be doing all they can to minimize the impact on the earth and the people affected. The smelter in Trail BC is currently owned by Teck, but some of what I’ll mention here preceded their ownership. Historically the Trail, BC smelter has not been the cleanest enterprise in the world. In fact the city of Trail was ranked as the second most polluted city in North America. As early as 1925, nearby settlers sued the smelter for damages to crops and forests. The real push to clean up their act started in 1975 when a study of the lead levels in young children were well above any reasonable safe level.
Teck has recently been in the news for some pollution that they have admitted they dumped into the Columbia river that flows past the smelter. Trail, BC is a stones throw away from the US border and the Columbia river flows south so the pollution has ended up in the US. I’d been reading the recent news stories and then bumped into the Teck controller the other day. I asked him how the lawsuit was affecting their financial reporting, expecting him to say that they were accruing millions of dollars for the potential costs. Nope. It turns out that while everyone knows what was dumped in the river, no one is all that clear on how much damage has occurred. Some people (mostly Teck employees) claim very little damage has occurred. So they’re paying for a bunch of environmental studies but no accrual beyond the costs of those studies has happened.
Then the controller mentioned to me that their bigger concern is selenium. What? I’ve studied Teck for years and never heard of selenium, how bad could it be? It turns out its not good news.
Ok, so Teck has some trouble with pollution of the Columbia river and then this selenium problem. How do these impact their financial statements? I was expecting the Columbia river lawsuit to show as an accrual which is a liability. Check out the balance sheet (the December 2012 financial statements have not yet been released). First, note that Teck is financially very healthy: total debt ($16 Billion) is less than 50% of the total assets ($34 Billion) and the current assets ($7.4 Billion) far exceed the current liabilities ($2.1 Billion). Next, realize that to find out very much about the accruals we’ll need to dive into the financial statement notes, particularly note 20 for “Other liabilities and provisions”. Also, notice at the bottom of the balance sheet, that contingencies are discussed in note 22, that will be interesting to read as well. Access the full financial statements and notes from the left hand side, “Consolidated Financial Statements (PDF)”.
Here is a portion of note 20:
This is a complex financial reporting topic but notice that selenium is mentioned in the second paragraph. Accounting for these types of costs requires a lot of estimation: how much the remediation may cost, when it will occur, an appropriate inflation rate, and an appropriate discount rate. Be very clear that the number shown in the financial statements is an estimate. I look forward to seeing how they adjust the December 2012 financial statements, I suspect the remediation costs will be dramatically higher.
Now let’s turn to note 22, the contingencies:
The important paragraph to read is that last one, “until the studies … are completed, it is not possible to estimate the extent and cost …” What that means is that Teck has not recorded any liability yet for the Columbia river pollution. They simply have no idea how much they may be on the hook for, if any amount, so have not recorded anything. This isn’t devious or wrong, its in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (IFRS) and highlights again how estimation and judgement are a huge part of the financial reporting.
Now back to the title, “CERCLA of life” – yes its a bad pun, my apologies to Simba et al. CERCLA is the US Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, otherwise known as Superfund. It does affect Teck, it has no impact on the Lion King.
Note: this blog was originally posted on my site hosted by Pearson Education(http://php2.pearsoncanada.ca/highered/inthenews/accounting_in_the_news/)