You have probably never heard of Livent Inc. or if you have your memory of what transpired within the company may have faded over the past 15 years. Yes, one of Canada’s most disgraceful accounting scandals is “celebrating” its 15th anniversary this year. Livent has also recently been in the news since the Ontario Securities Commission, the stock exchange regulator for Livent, has finally decided to actually regulate. I don’t want to be too harsh on the OSC, but really – it takes 15 years for you to decide that the perpetrators should be banned from being involved with publicly traded companies?
Let’s rewind to 1998 when the *&^% hit the fan. Livent had been on a roll; it was producing great theatre performances in Toronto including the Phantom of the Opera and had been reporting fantastic financial results. Ex-Disney executive Michael Ovitz purchased Livent in 1998 and then realized that it was a financial house of cards. Note: all the following documents are publicly available through SEDAR.com
First, let’s take a look at the original December 31, 1997 balance sheet:
Things to note:
- A small negative deficit ($27M)
- Accounts payable and accruals ($29 M) that are less than the cash available ($10M) and the accounts receivable ($32M)
- A preproduction cost asset, representing money already paid to develop future performances, $67M
Now, here is the restated balance sheet after examining some dodgy accounting practices:
Look at the December 31, 1997 column and compare that to the original figures:
- The deficit is longer small, it is $124M, approximately $100M larger than originally reported. Total equity now represents just 1% of the total assets. That means that 99% of the assets really belong to debt holders
- Accounts receivable have gone down by $13M and accounts payable has gone up by almost $20M
- Preproduction cost assets have decreased by $8M
With virtually all frauds, one key culprit is revenue recognition. Revenue would seem to be an easy thing to account for, but it can get complex pretty easily; primarily timing and amounts. A simple example of this was Livent’s treatment of certain sponsorship revenue. Like many arts organizations, Livent earned a portion of its revenue through sponsorship dollars – companies paying for the right to have their logo and signage in the lobby, on the stage, or on the playbill. This is very similar to the corporate logos you see at the hockey rinks. Assume that a business paid Livent $500,000 for the right to have their logo on the playbill of the Phantom. The company probably paid months in advance to secure its sponsorship right. When should Livent record that payment as revenue? (a) When they received the cash? (b) When the show started its 3 year run? (c) Or spread evenly over the three year run? If you answered (a) you want to review revenue recognition criteria ASAP, before you meet Livent executives in jail (IAS 18). If you answered (c), congratulations you’re well on your way to becoming an excellent accountant. Or it was just common sense. Its interesting how accounting, when done right, involves a lot of common sense.
Another frequent area of accounting fraud is to record expenses as an asset. How does this work? Well there is a fine line between assets and expenses. To keep it relatively simple, assets are expenses that have a benefit in the future. That’s why we capitalize property and buildings – they will provide a benefit for years to come. Conversely expenses do not have any future benefit, their benefit has all been used up in the current period. Well a fairly simple (and fraudulent) technique is to increase your net income by recording expenses as an asset. Did you notice that decrease in Livent’s preproduction costs? Yep, that’s what was going on. They were capitalizing (recording as an asset) production costs that were never going to generate any future value.
A third area where Livent got caught with their hand in the cookie jar was less common (I’ll explain why in a minute) – not even recording the expense. What was happening was as Livent got a bill in near year end, they were not paying the bill yet (that’s fine, that’s good cash flow management). A proper accounting system would set that bill up as an expense and as an account payable before year end. By ignoring that, Livent was artificially increasing their net income (since they didn’t record the expense) and artificially decreasing their liabilities (since they didn’t record the accounts payable). Wrong on both accounts. Now why is this not a common area of fraud? Because its pretty damn easy to find. All an auditor has to do is look through a stack of unpaid bills and subsequent bill payments and note the date on the bill. Prior to yearend? It should be recorded. Just after yearend? Let’s do a little more investigation. So Livent was a case of really sloppy auditing. No surprise that the three key auditors have all got their knuckles rapped pretty hard.
In conclusion, I know this case is REALLY old but its worth revisiting since it highlights very basic accounting principles that all accounting students should be able to understand. One final thought – if you’re involved as an accountant with a business avoid this kind of crap at all costs, its not worth it to your reputation.
Here is the official description of the accounting restatements that I discussed above (November 18, 1998 letter):
Note: this blog was originally posted on my site hosted by Pearson Education(http://php2.pearsoncanada.ca/highered/inthenews/accounting_in_the_news/)